Photo: Southern Water
A major change in the way the water industry is
regulated is underway. Ofwat in its Future Price Limits – statement of principals maps out the intended changes. The biggest changes are the move to
setting outcomes and not outputs with the outcomes set in conjunction with
customers. The rational is to encourage water companies to innovate and
outperform.
But
has Ofwat gone far enough? Several key constraints of the current system will
remain. Regulated Capital Value stays as a vital determinant and the regulatory
period stays as five years. This means that two of the biggest concerns of the
current system are likely to remain, the inherent bias towards capital
solutions and the adverse impact on the industry of the drop in investment at the
end of each regulatory period.
Ofwat
states that: “While we were reviewing
our price setting tools, many stakeholders told us that the way we treat capex
and opex separately has become complex and burdensome. We have also heard that
our approach may create perverse incentives, ranging from a bias towards capex
to a rigid, technical and inflexible approach from companies that are driven by
the detailed mechanisms we use. Others have perceived that our overall approach
may encourage ‘gaming’ or ‘padding’ of business plans by companies that may consider it in their interest to
inflate costs in their original submission.
But while Ofwat propose to move to a total
expenditure model as the way forward they then qualify the statement by
suggesting that a lot more work is needed to work out how it can actually be
done and that it might not be possible to implement it in the next regulatory
period!
Its clear that the water sector remains highly
attractive to investors, what is not clear is whether Ofwat has got the balance
right between the need to sustain investment while delivering an affordable
service. With the harsh economic environment – it is likely pressure from customers
to rebalance the equation will increase.

No comments:
Post a Comment